If anyone can come up with an example of a bus where:
- both i/o and memory resources are addressable
- access to them can be controlled
- but they can't be controlled independently
then by all means, reinstate this logic.
Under the terms of version 1.1, "once Covered Code has been published
under a particular version of the License, Recipient may, for the
duration of the License, continue to use it under the terms of that
version, or choose to use such Covered Code under the terms of any
subsequent version published by SGI."
FreeB 2.0 license refers to "dates of first publication". They are here
taken to be 1991-2000, as noted in the original license text:
** Original Code. The Original Code is: OpenGL Sample Implementation,
** Version 1.2.1, released January 26, 2000, developed by Silicon Graphics,
** Inc. The Original Code is Copyright (c) 1991-2000 Silicon Graphics, Inc.
** Copyright in any portions created by third parties is as indicated
** elsewhere herein. All Rights Reserved.
Official FreeB 2.0 text:
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/FreeB/SGIFreeSWLicB.2.0.pdf
As always, this code has not been tested for conformance with the OpenGL
specification. OpenGL conformance testing is available from
http://khronos.org/ and is required for use of the OpenGL logo in
product advertising and promotion.
The check can fail because the output from FBIOGET_VSCREENINFO is used to set
Clock in fbdev2xfree_timing(). Then in fbdevHWSetMode(), xfree2fbdev_timing()
is called which sets the pixclock based on Clock. The resulting circle results
in slight rounding errors, causing the comparision check in fbdev_modes_equal
to fail.
- Redo damage naming for more consistency.
- Call post submission functions only where appropriate.
- EXA can now live without it's odd damage workarounds.
No point warning about missing driver hooks, that just means the person
who gave you the driver is inept. Might as well just crash. Also,
just name anonymous screens as screen%d instead of failing after the 36th
screen. Bonus points if you can figure out what the failure mode would
be on the 36th screen, and what the effective screen limit was.
